ไทย
English
中國人
Chelsea have been handed a £10 million ($13.4 million) fine and a suspended transfer ban following a Football Association inquiry into unlawful agent and third-party payments made under the club's former ownership.
When BlueCo took over Chelsea in 2022, the group withheld a total of £150 million from the acquisition price after identifying, and then self-reporting, financial irregularities in the club's past records.
UEFA had already levied a €10 million ($11 million at the time) fine in July 2023 following their own separate inquiry, and the FA has now delivered its own verdict.
Having been found guilty of 74 rule violations, Chelsea are required to pay a £10 million fine and face a two-window registration ban suspended until the summer of 2027. An initial ruling that included a six-point deduction was, however, overturned on appeal.
Why Were Chelsea Under Investigation?
Documents uncovered during BlueCo's acquisition of the club from former owner Roman Abramovich revealed that, between 2011 and 2018, approximately £47.5 million was paid to 12 individuals or corporate entities connected to several high-profile transfer deals.
Transfers involving Eden Hazard, Kenedy, Ramires, David Luiz, Andre Schürrle, Nemanja Matić, Willian, Samuel Eto'o and at least one additional player all contained unlawful payments made to help push those deals through. None of the players themselves are considered to have acted improperly.
Upon discovering these details, Chelsea's current ownership immediately notified the relevant authorities, triggering investigations by the FA, the Premier League and UEFA.
Why Have Chelsea Avoided Harsher Sanctions?
Rival supporters continue to express frustration over the perceived leniency of the penalties imposed on Chelsea, who escaped a points deduction and face only a suspended registration ban — meaning the Blues can continue business as normal and will only be prohibited from signing players if further rule violations occur.
In the broader context, given that Chelsea specifically set aside considerably more funds in anticipation of these sanctions, the punishments are undeniably favorable to the club — though not without justification.
It has been acknowledged that these unlawful payments would likely have gone undetected had it not been for BlueCo's transparency, with their decision to self-report the violations and their ongoing cooperation throughout the process all counting in Chelsea's favor.
During the investigation, in the absence of evidence that could have been used against them, club officials also chose to accept liability rather than drag out any legal proceedings — a stance that was similarly recognized and appreciated by the FA.
Enable functional cookies to see this feature.
The payments were also determined to have had no effect on Chelsea's Profit and Sustainability reporting, meaning no broader financial concerns needed to be addressed.
Perhaps most notably, none of those currently involved with Chelsea had any connection to the illegal payments, all of which were made during the Abramovich era. Imposing severe penalties on BlueCo for misconduct carried out by a previous regime was ultimately considered unjust.