ไทย
English
中國人
Manchester City are said to have engaged in discussions regarding a financial settlement with the Premier League before their guilty verdict was announced, with negotiations ultimately falling apart due to the club's insistence on their innocence.
City have lodged an appeal against the ruling of an independent panel that found them guilty on the overwhelming majority of the 115 financial charges brought against them by the Premier League. Potential penalties range from fines and points deductions to trophy forfeiture and even expulsion from the top flight.
Before the guilty verdict was delivered, Bloomberg reports that City entered into discussions with the Premier League over what would have been a substantial financial settlement to draw the lengthy saga to a close.
The talks are understood to have broken down relatively quickly for one fundamental reason: City refused to concede guilt.
Shortly after withdrawing from settlement discussions, the Premier League confirmed that City had been found guilty of inflating their finances by approximately £900 million ($1.2 billion) between 2009 and 2018. Any resulting punishment is widely anticipated to extend well beyond a straightforward fine.
Why Would Man City Walk Away From Financial Settlement?
Since the charges were initially filed against City nearly four years ago, the club have consistently and publicly expressed their conviction that the matter would ultimately be resolved in their favor.
City have spent considerable time asserting they possess "irrefutable evidence" to establish their innocence, yet when those documents were presented, the panel overseeing the case scrutinized them thoroughly and ultimately found City guilty of significant rule violations.
Even that outcome has not altered City's position. The club remain firmly convinced of their innocence, a sentiment echoed by manager Enzo Maresca, who stated at his first press conference following the verdict that it was a matter of "when," not if, the club would succeed in their appeal.
Should City succeed in proving their innocence, no sanctions would be imposed. The club appear sufficiently confident in their ability to overturn the decision that the opportunity to reach a settlement with the Premier League held little appeal.
It is, to say the least, a daring approach. Should penalties be imposed, they are expected to be considerably harsher than a fine. The Premier League holds the authority to impose whatever punishment it deems appropriate, and the prevailing view is that City could face a substantial points deduction — potentially severe enough to see them relegated from the division.
That outcome would, without question, be far more damaging than any financial penalty, yet it reflects the depth of City's confidence that they chose not to yield when given the opportunity to mitigate the consequences.