ไทย
English
中國人
Everton are reportedly weighing up legal action against the Premier League over what they consider an overly lenient punishment handed to Chelsea for financial rule violations, with the absence of a points deduction leaving the Toffees consumed by "anger and dismay."
It was confirmed last week that Chelsea received a financial penalty of $14.3 million (£10.75 million)—the largest ever imposed by England's top division—after self-reporting concealed payments, primarily to player agents, totaling approximately $63 million between 2011 and 2018.
Chelsea were issued a suspended one-year ban on signing senior players, along with a nine-month academy transfer ban for separate matters. Both the fine and the suspended ban were reduced relative to standard regulations.
Despite knowingly violating the division's regulations, the Blues have walked away without any sporting punishment—much to the frustration of Everton.
The Merseyside club were deducted eight points during the 2023–24 Premier League season for two distinct breaches of profit and sustainability rules. The Guardian reports that Everton are planning to write to Premier League chief executive Richard Masters seeking greater clarity on the rationale behind Chelsea's punishment, while a "legal challenge" is also being considered.
Nottingham Forest, who suffered a four-point deduction in that same 2023–24 season, are also believed to be in communication with Everton, though it remains uncertain whether they will back any potential legal proceedings.
Chelsea are not the direct target of this potential lawsuit, but could still face consequences if the Premier League is found to have acted inconsistently with its own regulations.
David Moyes Captures Evertonian Fury
Everton manager David Moyes spoke on behalf of the club's entire fanbase when he responded with sharp skepticism to the news of Chelsea's sanction. "I don't think they have explained it well enough in the reasoning what the fine was and why it was," the Toffees boss stated ahead of his side's victory over Chelsea last weekend.
"I think they have to explain exactly what has happened here. If they don't then we are never going to understand their reasoning why.
"This is me not being anything against Chelsea, absolutely not, I'm just saying that everybody would like to know; Everton supporters, for the pain they had to go through when they had a huge points deduction, and other clubs as well.
"Those points deductions may well have been correct, I don't know, but we need to see what is the difference? What would you rather have, a £10 million fine or a 10-point deduction? The money you get for your league place now, that might cover it. It would be good if we could get more of an explanation. How much is the £10 million fine having an effect, really?"
Why Did Chelsea Avoid a Points Deduction?
Chelsea's ownership has drawn criticism on numerous fronts, yet they demonstrated rare shrewdness in handling this particular situation.
The improper payments at the center of this controversy occurred entirely during Roman Abramovich's tenure as Chelsea owner. Todd Boehly and Clearlake Capital identified these irregularities during due diligence prior to acquiring the club in 2022, deliberately setting aside roughly $200 million to cover any future penalties. The scale of that reserve suggests Chelsea were equally surprised by the relatively modest fine, though a separate Football Association investigation remains ongoing.
The limited statement released by the Premier League cited two primary reasons to justify why a sporting sanction for Chelsea "was not appropriate":
Chelsea's cooperation with the Premier League's investigation was consistently praised by the competition, which has faced staunch resistance in its ongoing dispute with Manchester City. The Guardian goes as far as suggesting that a conviction would have been impossible without Chelsea's assistance, effectively eliminating the possibility of a points deduction from the outset of negotiations.
The second element of the Premier League's justification is somewhat less convincing. The organization contends that Chelsea would have complied with the division's bookkeeping rules even if these agent payments had been declared openly—which raises the obvious question of why they were concealed in the first place.