ไทย
English
中國人
In the wake of a spying controversy that has engulfed Southampton, head coach Tonda Eckert has posted a public apology on social media, accepting full accountability for the club's misconduct and offering insight into the specific incidents of rule-breaking.
The Saints were disqualified from the Championship playoff finals last month after admitting to multiple violations of federation regulations, particularly those "requiring Clubs to act with the utmost good faith and prohibiting the observation of another Club's training session within 72 hours of a scheduled match."
The controversy, dubbed "Spygate," became public on May 8 after Southampton were charged with spying on playoff rivals Middlesbrough. A Southampton junior performance analyst was captured on CCTV at Middlesbrough's training facility and accused of filming the session. Further charges followed, with Southampton admitting to additional violations related to a December fixture against Oxford United and an April encounter with Ipswich Town.
Southampton's breach of EFL regulations significantly overshadows the impressive turnaround the club enjoyed in the second half of the season, rising from 15th place to as high as fifth to clinch a playoff berth. Despite the controversy, Southampton owner Dragan Šolak confirmed the club would not dismiss Eckert or his coaching staff. The Football Association could still impose a touchline ban on Eckert, however, restricting his ability to manage from the sidelines within the English football pyramid.
Beyond forfeiting the chance to earn approximately $295 million through the Championship promotion playoffs, Southampton will begin the new campaign with a four-point deduction.
Eckert Sends Apology to Fans, Reasons Spying
"Hi Saint supporters," the manager began, in a video on X. "What I am going to say is not going to be perfect, but I will try to be as honest and as clear I can be... For everything that has happened, I do apologize, and I hold my hand up because as the head coach, I am responsible for everything that has happened in this football club.
"I do apologize to the supporters...for the ones who have managed to bring us to the very end of the season where we were supposed to play the biggest game of the season," he added about expulsion from the playoffs. "I apologize to the players who have done everything they absolutely can in the last six months to bring this football club back to where it belongs. They would have deserved to play the final."
The 33-year-old German attributed his staff's spying behavior to the contrasting norms found in other European football leagues.
"When I worked in Italy for over four years, every starting lineup that we had chosen for games was always out in the media before games, and the reason is that our training sessions, especially the ones before games, have always been observed from media and observed from opponent teams that we came up against," he said.
"It has become common practice in Germany to observe training sessions knowing that other teams were doing the same. I don't say this to excuse anything we have done, but to give you context in the way I grew up and the football world. There are different rules from the EFL, and I should have known them."
Eckert's assertion that he was unaware of EFL regulations comes despite reports from the League Arbitration Panel indicating that certain performance analysts did raise objections when Eckert instructed them to monitor opponents' training sessions, with the analyst who watched Middlesbrough even fleeing after being spotted, hastily changing clothes in a restroom and deleting his LinkedIn profile out of fear of being identified online.
Eckert Details Specific Spying Instances
Eckert went on to confirm the two remaining spying allegations, acknowledging the unauthorized observation of Oxford's training ahead of their Dec. 26 fixture, a 2–1 defeat, as well as Ipswich Town's session before their April 28 match, which ended in a 2–2 draw.
His choice to spy on Oxford stemmed from interim manager Craig Short's arrival at the club. "We decided to send someone to the training session to see if they would switch from a back-five to a back-four," Eckert explained.
Regarding the Ipswich incident, which concluded in a 2–2 draw, Eckert maintained he had no prior knowledge: "When I came into the meeting room two hours before kickoff to prepare my prematch meeting. I was shown the footage for the first time. I asked for it to be stopped, and none of it had an effect on how we played in the game that evening."
Eckert was, however, aware of the Middlesbrough spying incident last month, as he was keen to determine the availability of key midfielder Hayden Hackney for the Championship semifinals. "We had made a decision on Monday to send somebody to observe the training session and find out if he would be available for the game or not."
Southampton won the tie 2–1 on aggregate to reach the final; nevertheless, Eckert insisted that none of the spying incidents had any bearing on the outcomes on the pitch. He maintained that the club's remarkable rise in the second half of the season was entirely down to the improved displays of Southampton's players.
"This is the bit of the irony of the cases," he said. "None of what has happened had an effect on our sporting performance... It has always been the players in every single game that have made the difference."
Whether the FA will permit Eckert to continue in his coaching role is yet to be determined.