ไทย
English
中國人
U.S. network Fox Sports has been accused of breaching FIFA's regulations concerning the scheduling of in-game commercial breaks during Thursday's coverage of Mexico vs. South Africa.
After years of buildup, the opening match of the 2026 World Cup was not one to be missed—yet that was precisely the situation for some viewers watching in the United States, if only for a brief moment.
Under FIFA's new tournament guidelines aimed at player welfare, every match will be paused approximately halfway through each half for a three-minute "hydration break," regardless of weather conditions. While this gives players an opportunity to recover amid the scorching temperatures expected across North America in June and July, it also gives broadcasters a rare window to air commercials before the standard 15-minute halftime break.
Shortly after Raúl Jiménez doubled Mexico's advantage in the 67th minute with a powerful header at the far post, referee Wilton Sampaio used that natural stoppage as the ideal moment to call the second mid-half hydration break of the match. Fox immediately cut to their commercial sponsors.
While FIFA has not officially disclosed the rules handed to broadcasters regarding the volume of advertising permitted, The Athletic reports that all networks received the same set of guidelines to follow:
Fox appeared to return to coverage of Mexico's 2–0 victory over South Africa only after play had already resumed in the 71st minute, rather than 30 seconds before the restart, seemingly violating the reported guidelines.
What Went Wrong With Fox's Broadcast?
Jiménez's strike clearly caught South Africa's defense off guard, and the U.S. broadcast team may have also been momentarily thrown off as well.
The referee signaled for the hydration break while Jiménez was surrounded by celebrating teammates, and Fox remained with the live match feed for an additional 33 seconds—exceeding the minimum of 20—to show a slow-motion montage of fans in the stands. The commercial break itself lasted only 1 minute and 54 seconds, well within the two-minute, 10-second allowance, but the delayed start to the break threw the entire sequence off schedule.
The match itself didn't resume until approximately 70:10 on the game clock, yet the broadcast only rejoined the action when the clock showed 70:18.
It amounted to just a few inconsequential seconds lost during routine South African possession, but whether any formal consequences will follow remains to be seen.